|
December 28,
2010
Article 6.1 of the Republic
of Ireland
Constitution
By William
Finnerty
"This new 'bankers bailout
law' represents the most serious violation of
Article 6.1 of our written Constitution that the
people of the Republic of Ireland have been
subjected to thus far by the three main branches
of our own Government (Executive, Legislative and
Judicial), and I believe this because I believe
the negative consequences are likely to be the
most serious so far: unless, that is, this new
piece of legislation is very smartly cancelled
through a successful 'judicial review' challenge."
::::::::
There appears to be a
great lack of commitment to our written
Constitution, Bunreacht na
hEireann
which literally means "The Basic Law of
Ireland" in the Celtic language, and this weak
spot possibly reflects a general but dangerous
lack of awareness of the importance of written
constitutions, and the crucially important part
they are meant to play with regard to the
protection and wellbeing of sovereign independent
nation states such as the Republic of
Ireland.
Correctly or otherwise, I am very
firmly of the view that the Republic of Ireland
cannot ever become a truly independent sovereign
nation state, unless the majority of the people of
the Republic of Ireland start learning about (and
supporting) Bunreacht na hEireann in ways that
count.
Personally, I was very shocked
(though not in the slightest bit surprised) by the
way President Mary McAleese
signed the "bankers bailout" bill into law on
December 21st 2010.
Given the circumstances
she found herself in on December 21st 2010, I
believe President McAleese should undoubtedly have
instead used the first-class constitutional
facilities available to her through Article 26.1.1 of
Bunreacht na hEireann to have the extremely dubious bill in
question referred to the Supreme Court: so that
our senior judges could study the bill regarding
the core legal issue of its extraordinarily
doubtful constitutionality. The facilities in
question are better perhaps than in any other
written constitution in the whole world; and, in
addition to not costing her a single penny, they
enable her to lawfully make a final single-minded
decision on all such referrals without reference
to anybody else. The fact that President Mary
McAleese failed, given the circumstances on the
day, to refer this very doubtful and potentially
disasterous bill to our Supreme Court judges,
represents (in my view) an amazingly serious and
very worrying violation of our written
Constitution.
Far worse though is the fact
that the people of the Republic of Ireland appear
to have been unlawfully denied, by our own
Government, our constitutional right (i.e. our
"basic law" right) to have the all important
"FINAL" say -- using an Article 6.1 based
referendum -- as to whether or not we wished to
see the bankers bailed out (regarding their
massive self-inflicted gambling debts) in the way
this new piece of law permits and supports: at
the potentially UNLIMITED expense of the
people of the Republic of Ireland, it would
appear. This, I believe, represents the most
serious violation of Article 6.1 of our written
Constitution, by the three main branches of our
own Government (Executive, Legislative and
Judicial), that the people of the Republic of
Ireland have been subjected to thus far, and I
believe this because I believe the negative
consequences are likely to be the most serious so
far: unless, that is, this new piece of
legislation is very tidily and rapidly cancelled
through a successful judicial review
challenge.
As I have found to my extreme
cost though, and unless things have recently
changed very dramatically in the Republic of
Ireland's legal profession, anybody who tries (on
their own, and who is not a TD such as Pearse Doherty for
example), to raise a "judicial review" challenge
relating to this new piece of Republic of Ireland
"bankers bailout" law, can fully expect -- in my
view, and based on my own personal experiences
over a period of several years -- to very rapidly
run into major complications and
difficulties (not to mention very
severe punishments involving C-PTSD injuries), which
means they will be callously, ruthlessly,
viciously, repeatedly, and with complete impunity, blocked at
every point by all of the public officials, public bodies and
individuals concerned, from succeeding
with the initiation of any such legal
challenge.
I have attempted to relay my
concerns relating to these issues to the Republic
of Ireland High Court President Justice Nicholas Kearns
in an e-mail I sent to him (and several others) on
December 21st 2010. For anybody interested, a copy
of the e-mail I used can be viewed at the
following www location: http://www.humanrightsireland.com/JusticeNicholasKearns/21December2010/Email.htm
And, as
can seen at the www address just above, I also
used the opportunity to try and point out to
Justice Nicholas Kearns (and to all of the other
people included in the recipient lists of the
e-mail in question) that the highly respected and
exceptionally well-placed United States Congressman Louis T.
McFadden had extreme concerns of the
deepest nature about the "forefathers" of the
present "privately owned global banking cartel"
setup (which "The Fed" is a very major part of)
that involved bringing "formal charges against the Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve Bank
system (i.e. the privately owned Central Bank of
the US), The Comptroller of the Currency and the
Secretary of United States Treasury for numerous
criminal acts, including but not limited to,
CONSPIRACY, FRAUD, UNLAWFUL CONVERSION, AND
TREASON".
Unfortunately, Mr Mc Fadden died
before he completed his desperately needed
task.
What a VERY different and much better
world it might be today, had US Congressman Louis
T. Mc Fadden lived long enough to finish the
unusually valuable and still much needed legal
challenge he was working on?
The above text
is very largely based on a "comment" relating to a
recent TV interview with musician, singer,
songwriter, and activist Jim
Corr at the following www location: http://www.sovereignindependent.com/?p=11324&cpage=1#comment-94834
=============================
Constitutional
Law "is the law, is the law, is the law" -- or is
it?
On December 28th 2010, and with the
2,500 year old plus Tripartite Separation of
Powers
Doctrine in mind,
a very similar copy of the above text
was sent by e-mail to, among several other
lawyers, Republic of Ireland High Court
President Justice Nicholas Kearns. A copy of
the e-mail used can be viewed at the following
www location: http://www.humanrightsireland.com/JusticeNicholasKearns/28December2010/Email.htm
=============================
MEPs
& Presidential Hopefuls Informed
...
On December 30th 2010 a very
similar copy of the above text was sent by e-mail
to two Republic of Ireland citizens who have
publicly expressed a wish to become the next
president of the Republic of Ireland (the next
Presidential Election in the Irish Republic is due
to be held in 2011), and, to a
multinational group of MEPs (Members
of the European Parliament). A copy of the e-mail
used can be viewed at the following www
location: http://www.humanrightsireland.com/MichaelHigginsTD/30December2010/Email.htm
=============================
Police
Informed ...
Allowing for the fact that
deliberately contrived unconstitutional
activities, and the production and
sustenance of unconstitutional law
in particular, appears to me to involve extremely
serious forms of treasonous crime, a
number of senior police officers have been
informed by e-mail on January 1st 2011 regarding
the matters related above. To view a copy of the
e-mail used, please click on the following www
link: http://www.humanrightsireland.com/LondonMetropolitanPolice/1January2011/Email.htm
=============================
Group
of UK Parliamentarians Informed ...
As
the Bank of England is believed (by me) to
still be very heavily involved in what I see as
the fraudulent practice of fractional reserve
lending to governments, which includes
interest charges (on
money created from
nowhere out of
nothing), a copy of the above
information was sent by e-mail on January 2nd 2011
to a group of 40 or so UK Parliamentarians which
included UK Attorney General Dominic Grieve QC
MP. A copy of the e-mail used can be
viewed at the following www location: http://www.humanrightsireland.com/UK/Parliament/Group2/2January2010/Email.htm
=============================
E-mail
to UK Chancellor of the Exchequer George Osborne
MP
Mindful of the recently agreed UK £3.25bn bi-lateral
loan arrangements to
the Republic of
Ireland, and the associated
€400m in interest
payments the UK plans to earn from the
transaction in question, the above "Article
6.1" information was sent to George Osborne MP
(UK Chancellor of the Exchequer), and to a number
of his UK parliamentary colleagues, on January 4th
2011.
A copy of the e-mail used can be
viewed at the following Internet location: http://www.humanrightsireland.com/UK/Parliament/Group1/4January2011/Email.htm
On
account of all the major fraud and corruption which
such financial transactions are believed to
involve, and as can be seen at the www address
just above, the e-mail was also copied to a number
of senior police
officers.
=============================
Most of the above text is now also
on view at the following Open
News location: http://www.opednews.com/Diary/Article-6-1-of-the-Republi-by-William-Finnerty-101228-177.html
=============================
Human
Rights Ireland http://www.humanrightsireland.com
============================= | | |
|
|